On Apr 11, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:

Andrus Adamchik wrote:
...
The biggest issue so far is the moderation. Our old list simply bounced posts from addresses that are not subscribed, and it worked extremely
well. Current setup sends those emails to me and Bill for  moderation
(approval or rejection). Of course all of those messages  are spam. I
received 96 moderation spams since March 28. So the moderation has to
be replaced with bounces.

You don't have to respond at all to reject a post -- just ignore those
moderation requests (I delete them). After a week they'll time out and
automatically be rejected.

Just respond to the ones you want approved. That saves time.

 -jean

Hi Jean,

Thanks for the links on infra participation in your other message.

I know that I don't have to reply to moderation messages... But the same thing is often said about spam in general - "just hit delete" - a solution I personally can't live with. Besides moderation spam is worse than general spam, as I have to inspect all moderation messages (moderation is enabled, I am a moderator, so I can't ignore my duties :-)).

At the same time changing moderation to bouncing solves the problem once and for all.

Andrus

Reply via email to