My take on that - it doesn't matter. We would also want WebWork,
Struts, etc. folks to choose Cayenne. Actually the main point is to
demonstrate the search capability, so even if it is vanilla JSP, it
will be ok. So I would say Tomas should probably stick with the
framework he is most comfortable with.
Andrus
On May 9, 2006, at 10:20 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
Given that I'm not contributing directly to this, my suggestions
probably have little weight. However, I would suggest either #1 or
#3. #1 is nice because I think ideally we'd like to sell the
Tapestry folks on Cayenne over Hibernate and a good solid app will
help that. Additionally, Cayenne & Tapestry are both ASF projects,
so it'd nice in that regard. #2 is not much different from #1, but
is non-ASF.
#3 is nice because nearly all examples use Cayenne in the context
of a webapp and it'd be nice to see a good desktop app example.
--
Kevin
On Tue, 09 May 2006 16:15:19 -0400, Tomas Jucius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have thought about demonstrating application and I would like to
implement
one of these:
1) Applicaton with Tapestry 4 front end. Could possibly change
Tapestry 3
example.
2) Application with Wicket 1.2 front end. Could be good Wicket
example.
3) Simple swing application.
