Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Hi Craig, > > On Jul 17, 2006, at 11:06 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: ... >>> and before Windows build LGPL dependency [2] is resolved? >> >> >> I think the JIRA has is correct. You cannot distribute any LGPL code >> from Apache, so you would have to have the user download, install, >> and link the launcher with your executable. It doesn't sound like >> your "binary" distribution can easily use this technique, though. So >> you would need either an alternative technology or a distribution of >> code and a process to link the pieces together. Good luck (I'm not >> familiar with the technology enough to help you here). > > I think Roller released with LGPL dependencies, so there is a > precedent. But I am with you on the general idea that we shouldn't rush > it until it is ready. In practical terms it means we will need to > branch 2.0 (our "ObjectStyle -> Apache migration helper release"), and > continue developing 3.0 on HEAD, while we resolve all the things above. >
oops, I hit send on my reply before I saw Craig's and yours replies, so my post is crossing a bit with yours. Roller released with an LGPL dependency? That'd be good to nail down in the archives. -jean
