Andrus,
If we're going to go this far, should we plan ahead and figure out
what we're going to use as syntax for "Right Outer Join" and "Full
Outer Join"?
Implementing these should be trivial once Left Outer Join is done.
If Left is "+", is right "-"? :-)
And is full "+/-"? :-)
Yes, I recently got a DVD burner :-)
On 8/17/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 17, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Good point. Looks like we will need to change
> 'resolvePathComponents' iterator meaning to return a sequence of
> wrapper objects that have both relationship/attribute and the join
> semantics:
>
> class PathComponent {
> protected Object metadataObject;
> protected (?) joinSematics;
> }
Or rather instead of "change semantics" create another iterator
method with a different name - don't want to break the existing apps.
Andrus
