DataViews or CAY-400?
In any event, in 3.0 we have no intention to deprecate current
Cayenne mapping format. And if we do in the future releases, IMO we
should preserve all Cayenne extras (whether DV falls in the "extras"
category depends on whether we still support it in the core by then).
JPA allows that via mapped properties, in a way similar to CAY-400.
Andrus
On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:09 AM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
Is the DataView design compatible with the JPA direction of Cayenne,
i.e. will the *.map.xml file become obsolete?
regards Malcolm
On 10/9/06, Malcolm Edgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes CAY-400 would be very useful, especially if we can take it
down to
a field level. Examples could include:
* database table and field comments
* field metadata, e.g. minvalue="5", label="Customer No."
I will take this up dicussion further on the JIRA
regards Malcolm
On 10/9/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually if all you need is to attach arbitrary properties to the
> mapping objects, I suggest that we work on this Jira issue:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-400
>
> adding this functionality to the Modeler itself. It is fairly
> straightforward and is long overdue - it was promised to the users
> quite some time ago.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > Hi Malcolm,
> >
> > DVModeler is available up to and including 2.0.x release.
> >
> > We removed it from the trunk recently, because there are no
> > volunteers to support it, and it hasn't been updated for many
years
> > now, becoming a liability. We can always resurrect it if somebody
> > steps in and dedicates enough time to this piece of technology.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Oct 8, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Malcolm Edgar wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I wanted to enquire about the status of the Cayenne DataView
> >> modeller.
> >>
> >> The reason being we are looking at defining related UI
metadata for
> >> applications.
> >>
> >> regards Malcolm Edgar
