3. We'll submit the proposal for the vote by Incubator PMC.
This will be on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, does it matter that we are sponsored by DB PMC as far as who
should vote, DB or Incubator PMC? (the ultimate vote is of course the
Board)
Andrus
On Nov 15, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Andrus,
This is great news for those of us who have been following your
progress. I have just a couple of comments for you.
On Nov 15, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Looks like there are no obstacles for us to move ahead with
Cayenne graduation. The links below are some threads from other
projects graduation "hearings".
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/
200611.mbox/%3cAE415EFF-3825-4F8C-AD93-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/
200603.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The procedure is somewhat vague, but I think it would look like this:
1. I will draft a proposal for the ASF board to accept Cayenne as
a TLP at Apache.
I'd suggest you make sure to include a pointer to your release as a
proof point that you're really ready to graduate. And it will help
to run Robert's RAT detector on the release if you haven't already
done.
2. We'll vote for it on this list. This vote won't be binding in a
sense that we can't make a graduation decision on our own. However
it is important to have, as this will be indication that we are
ready.
3. We'll submit the proposal for the vote by Incubator PMC.
This will be on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Go for it!
Craig
4. If/when it passes, it will be sent to the board where the final
decision is made.
It'll probably take me a few days to do the proposal. Please speak
up if you have any comments.
Andrus
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
