Hi Andrus,Yes, there is a difference between consensus to make a release (begin the release process) and approval of a release (after the release artifacts are available for testing etc.).
I'd suggest using the [VOTE] subject only for the approval. Seems like lazy consensus is sufficient to begin the process. If there is a need to get lots of input to begin, you might tag the discussion thread with [DISCUSS], but that's just to call attention to the mail...
Craig On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Another note (something I overlooked, getting too excited about the first release from Apache and all that). We'll still have to do all the due diligence once the release artifacts are posted, ensuring that (a) they work and (b) there are no legal issues, like missing license headers and all that.So we will have another (consequential) vote once a release admin (I guess that's me at the moment) posts the release files.Andrus On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:Okay. I'm throwing my +1 into the ring then, for both releases. -- Kevin-----Original Message----- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [VOTE] Re: Cayenne 2.0.2 (and 1.2.2)(That's +1 from me, but I'd also like to do a formal votethread oncewe see that there is a consensus)The way it goes, this might as well be considered a vote thread, so I am renaming it for easier identification. Andrus
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
