Luke Hoersten wrote:
> I've stopped using FF 2 completely because its so slow on Linux. I
> have the same problems you are describing, Luis, but with all plugins
> and FF, not just mozcc. Perhaps this problem is with FF's plugin
> interface.
> 

I doubt it.  Even if I weren't predisposed to doubt it, it wouldn't fit 
with Luis's experience of degraded performance between versions of 
MozCC: it'd be a consistent (or probably at least linear) degradation 
regardless of which extensions or versions you had installed.  Instead 
it seems more likely that we've changed something that exercises the 
browser in a different way.

Hrm, that's an idea, actually... most of the changes in this update 
happened in the RDFa module.  You can download a build with RDFa 
disabled at 
http://mirrors.creativecommons.org/software/mozcc/download/mozcc-2.3.9.1-nordfa.xpi.
 
  I'd be interested in hearing if that fixes the performance problems 
for anyone experiencing them.

Thanks,

Nathan

> -Luke
> 
> On 1/22/07, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I admittedly didn't do much testing without MozCC installed v. with it
>>> installed, but rather between the old and new version.  So I'll take a
>>> look as well and see if its something I might have missed.
>> FWIW, I've been using mozcc religiously (given the conflict, I
>> disabled operator, not mozcc ;) so my first comparison was between old
>> and new mozcc.
>>
>> Luis
>>
>>> Luis Villa wrote:
>>>> On 1/22/07, Nathan R. Yergler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> An updated version of MozCC is now available for testing.  Version 2.3.9
>>>>> is a recommended update as it resolves a number of outstanding issues
>>>>> including:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Rewrite of the RDFa extraction engine which no longer pollutes
>>>>> Javascript prototypes
>>>>> * Performance enhancements when extracting RDFa from documents
>>>>> * Interoperability fixes with other extensions
>>>> For what it is worth, Nathan, this fixes the interoperability problems
>>>> I had with Operator[1] but the new plugin seems to completely degrade
>>>> ffox performance on most of the pages I used- took several times
>>>> longer to load my blog and mail.google.com. This happens with or
>>>> without Operator installed, so it isn't the result of an interaction
>>>> with Operator.
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone else seeing this? I don't have time (class shortly) to
>>>> uninstall/disable *all* of my plugins, but I'm guessing if Nathan
>>>> didn't see it it must be an interaction with some other plugin, so
>>>> I'll have to back everything out later tonight if no one else is
>>>> seeing it.
>>>>
>>>> Luis
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4106/
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cc-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nathan R. Yergler
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> Creative Commons
>>>
>>> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cc-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Nathan R. Yergler
Senior Software Engineer
Creative Commons

http://wiki.creativecommons.org/User:NathanYergler
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel

Reply via email to