Peter, Makes sense to me. I had never thought of it that way. Thanks for all your hard work. ~Scott
Peter Miller wrote: > Hi All, > > I have finished up first pass of adding Doxygen comments to the > functions in the liblicense.h file, and I've moed on to documenting > *how* to actually use the library, for simple use cases like > > - how to obtain the license attached to a file > - how to display the attributes of a license > > real beginner stuff. I'll have a commit in a couple of hours. > > > But I've noticed an inconsistency, a big one. The module functions have > "module" in them, and the jurisdiction functions have "jurisdiction" in > them, etc. But the license functions don't have "license" in them. > > For example, ll_verify_uri is used to confirm that its argument is a > valid license URI. But attributes are also URIs, so going by this > function name it would be reasonable to expect that you could pass an > attribute URI to ll_verify_uri. I would like to suggest adding the word > "license" to license specific functions. > > (We could keep the old names as well, but add the gcc "deprecated" > attribute, to encourage use of the new names.) > > What do folks think? > > Regards > Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > /\/\* http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/ > > PGP public key ID: 1024D/D0EDB64D > fingerprint = AD0A C5DF C426 4F03 5D53 2BDB 18D8 A4E2 D0ED B64D > See http://www.keyserver.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. > > "This code is like a gob of peanut butter for the roof of your > brain." -- Final Cut Pro easter egg > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel > _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
