On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> Further, pmiller has suggested we stick to C89 constructs. I'm feeling
> generous today, so I'll consider that reasonable. If we do want to stick
> to it, we should modify our compile process so that with GCC we used
> -std=c89 or -ansi so that the codebase does not compile with non-C89
> constructs.
I just tried std=c89, and xdgmime has comments in // style. If our
dependencies aren't going to be C89, I see no reason we should be.
New position: Screw C89, let's stick with std=gnu89.
-- Asheesh.
--
Eighty percent of married men cheat in America. The rest cheat in Europe.
-- Jackie Mason
_______________________________________________
cc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
