On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 04:26 -0700, Nathan Yergler wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Jon Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah, back to the open public lists... > > > > I'm curious Hubert, if you have exempi included into any apps? And, what > > distros exempi is included in? > > > > http://libopenraw.freedesktop.org/wiki/Exempi > > > > Have you had any luck with that and getting it into the core of the > > desktop? > > > > I'm trying to do an assessment of what needs to be done to get > > liblicense into gnome and possibly some other targets apps so that it is > > a default library on the major open source/free software desktops... > > > > http://creativecommons.org/projects/liblicense > > > > For those of you late to the party, liblicense is: Low-level license > > metadata integration for applications. > > > > The roadmap hasn't been updated in a while, but Asheesh/Nathan have been > > working on it... > > > > One of my goals is to get it into KDE and Gnome and major distros by > > default: ubuntu, fedora, suse, gentoo (ok, that is not as high a > > priority, but what I use...no lashing out at me on that one ;) > > > > Before we discussed good target apps for liblicense integration > > including miro, eye of gnome...are there other low hanging fruit ones to > > add, and/or how can we encourage integration as part of google summer of > > code? > > Not to be a stickler, but isn't asking for app integration suggestions > the same as discussing targets for integration? ;)
y > We really have a chicken + egg problem: distros may be uninterested in > bundling liblicense without a demonstrated need (ie, something > depending on it). Developers may be reluctant to accept a patch that > adds a dependency that's not available anywhere (I would be). So > we're currently pursuing a two pronged approach: inclusion in at least > one high level distro, patches for existing apps. Right, integration into key app will drive library getting into distro...and not the reverse...no one wants an empty library without any use in the d-istro. > Asheesh has tasks in his work queue related to developing patches for > something like EoG; once we have that in place (or as that's > developing), I think we'll probably target Debian first -- if nothing > else their inclusion process is well defined, so we know exactly how > to get the package in. > > NRY Yep, that sounds purrrfect...anyone else out their in cc-devel land have any thoughts and/or coding energy to help? Jon > > > > Cheers! > > > > Jon > > > > -- > > Jon Phillips > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > skype: kidproto (preferred phone) > > im: kidproto > > china phone: +86 1-360-282-8624 > > > > Business + Community Manager > > Creative Commons > > www.creativecommons.org > > > > > > Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be > > legal advice nor should they be relied upon as or represented to be > > legal advice. Creative Commons cannot and does not give legal advice. > > You need to assess the suitability of Creative Commons' tools for > > your particular situation, which may include obtaining appropriate > > legal advice from a licensed attorney. > > > > > > -- Jon Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: kidproto (preferred phone) im: kidproto china phone: +86 1-360-282-8624 Business + Community Manager Creative Commons www.creativecommons.org Please note: the contents of this email are not intended to be legal advice nor should they be relied upon as or represented to be legal advice. Creative Commons cannot and does not give legal advice. You need to assess the suitability of Creative Commons' tools for your particular situation, which may include obtaining appropriate legal advice from a licensed attorney. _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
