Hi Keisuke -- I'm not aware of anyone who's modeled the licenses you mentioned using ccREL.
With respect to the other terms and conditions (such as a requirement to document), I think the guideline I'd give is that if you can use existing vocabulary, do so, and create your own if you need new features. For example, ccREL includes the Derivative Works permission and you could layer it with a new "Document Changes" requirement to get the effect you asked about. Nathan On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Keisuke Ai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I have some questions about ccREL. > > Reading documents of ccREL, I understand that ccREL is designed > for writing various licenses not only CCL but also other licenses > including future licenses. This is a wonderful design for its > general purpose. > > I am trying to describe some licenses, such as Artistic License, > Free Art License and MPL by ccREL, because I'd like to build a system > which searches and compares those licenses. > Are there anyone who have tried such definition? > > Some licenses set different conditions on distribution and derivative works. > (e.g. You may modify the Work provided that you document that.) > Do you have any good ideas to describe these differences? > > -- > Keisuke Ai > > > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel > _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
