HI Juanjo, That's great! I admit the situation with XMP isn't all that clear, but I don't think there's an inconsistency with what we're recommending. Let me take the fields/pieces one at a time.
First, the XMP generated by the license chooser ([2] in your original message) defines three different things -- 1) xapRIghts:Marked is set to "True", indicating that there's rights information. 2) dc:rights contains a human readable statement about the license. 3) cc:license points to the actual license resource. So software displaying this information might show the contents of dc:rights and provide a license to cc:license if available. If you look at the description of xmpRights:WebStatement on http://wiki.creativecommons.org/XMP it indicates that it contains the "URL containing metadata about the XMP-embedded file". The XMP schema documentation describes it as "The location of a web page describing the owner and/or rights statement for this resource." So this isn't the license itself, but a page where more metadata or information is available (ie, maybe the copyright page for the work on my web site). Reviewing the schema documentation, I think you may be correct that our template needs to be updated in the following ways: 1) We need to use xmpRights as the RDF prefix for the XMP Rights schema (I believe this has changed in the XMP spec over the years). 2) We need to replace or supplement dc:rights with xmpRights:UsageTerms, as the schema documentation indicates this is human readable text for how the resource may be used. I've opened a ticket for that -- http://code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue505 Let me know if things still aren't clear or if I've missed something. Nathan 2009/10/27 Juan José Marín Martínez <[email protected]>: > Hi CC-developers, > > I added some basic license support for PDF documents on Evince [1], a document > viewer for multiple document formats from the GNOME desktop. > > The metadata I check for this is: > > 1) xmpRights:Marked > 2) dc:rights > 3) cc:license > 4) xmpRights:WebStatement > > However, I'm not quite sure if I've done the right thing because I've found > confusing information on the CC Wiki pages. > > On one hand, we are told to mark PDF files with dc:rights [2], but on another > hand, we are told to use xmpRights:UsageTerms for this [3]. > > What should I do ? .... And well, I think that the template or the XMP > instructions must be changed accordingly. > > TIA, > > -- Juanjo Marín > > [1] > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/evince/commit/?id=516c4e3273b664ee2b10d6348d3484726f4461fd > > [2] > http://creativecommons.org/license/xmp?q_1=2&q_1=1&field_commercial=yes&field_derivatives=yes&field_jurisdiction=us&field_format=&field_worktitle=&field_attribute_to_name=&field_attribute_to_url=&field_sourceurl=&field_morepermissionsurl=&lang=en_US&language=en_US&n_questions=3 > This link is on http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking/Creators , on the > instructions for PDF files. > > [3] http://wiki.creativecommons.org/XMP > > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel > _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
