Hi Greg, Thanks for the response.
comments inline. Cheers, Maarten On Jan 15, 2013, at 20:20 , Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > Maarten, > > I didn't want to let this linger without a response while I work on the > details in the background... > > <quote name="Maarten Zeinstra" date="2013-01-15" time="00:54:28 +0100"> >> The semweb war is not our war. Good rights labelling is our war. ( I >> challenge anyone who thinks otherwise :) ) > > Agree :) > >> Although any winner of the semwar will influence the way we need to >> communicate rights information. It is best for CC to be neutral and >> provide help to all parties. Porting CCRel to microdata or >> mircoformats should not be too difficult. Making a xsd for ccrel is >> peanuts. I even worked on it with Nathan Yergler but our mails >> conversation about that suddenly seemed to stop in september 2010. >> >> I've included my draft that I communicated to Ben Adida, Mike >> Linksvayer and Nathan Yergler in 2010, although I haven't read it >> since. > > Thanks for that. For some reason LibreOffice couldn't open that > correctly, but Google Docs could. It is here (and publicly commentable, > I can add you as an author if you like and send me your preferred email > for that): > http://goo.gl/w6MFk This address will do just fine. > >> I can work on these issues, write and review drafts if only there is >> someone at CC-HQ that is able to actually publish/change/coordinate >> something. > > I will take up the lead on that from CC HQ for now. I don't want good > work to be lost. Good > >> You state that you want to add a page to the wiki with examples, but I >> think CC-HQ has tried and tested the Wiki solution for quite some time >> now and has to determine that hat way simply does not work. Those >> pages are a big unsupervised mess. Simply adding more information to >> those pages shows only that there is no determination of getting >> CC-technology structured and useful. To give an example, I don't think >> I ever found the link http://labs.creativecommons.org/2011/ccrel-guide >> before you said in your mail below. > > Right, more info isn't good (and I agree with Jonas' later email) > without a concerted effort to streamline. I do think the wiki is a fine > place for some documentation, but the current state of things, well, > isn't good, and doesn't lead to a sane situation. Maybe we should create or find a page that lists all products/ ways that CC tries to communicates technology and see if there are affiliates or volunteers that like to rank them on their importance, then build a better tech outreach plan based on that. > >> Sorry for the rant, but this has been frustrating me for a while now. > > No worries, Maarten, I understand completely. > >> Now let's be pro active and practical: Greg if you can put that page >> http://labs.creativecommons.org/2011/ccrel-guide on a google doc, open >> it for all to comment and place that link on this mailing list.i > > I just noticed that the guide has its own git repository on > code.creativecommons.org: > http://code.creativecommons.org/viewgit/ccrel-guide.git/ > > But, I've also put up a commentable version on Google Docs here: > http://goo.gl/v7GAT -- It isn't the prettiest of displays, but it works > for now. Google docs works fine for me. I lowers the threshold for anyone to comment on the doc. > > > Thanks for the prodding, Maarten. > > Greg > > -- > | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | > | http://grossmeier.net A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
