<quote name="Kat Walsh" date="2013-04-18" time="00:57:57 +0200"> > We are considering > an idea to separate the legal code from the non-legal code elements of the > web page more cleanly, and have the part that is the legal code itself be > in a separate file that will never change, while the HTML version may > change elements (such as page navigation) that are not actually part of the > legal code.
I really don't have much to add to Maarten and Mike's comments here, honestly. I like the idea of a plaintext-like base from which everything is generated, but the only non-HTML markup that would probably be standardized enough and not proprietary and/or stupid is something like XML (wait, I did say not stupid....). ;-) And if we're doing XML, might as well do HTML. So yeah, barebones HTML, with all basic formatting included (bolding, section numbering, etc) but with all styling in css/js as appropriate, where that stuff can change as needed. I guess we trust CC enough to not use CSS to hide certain parts of the license text ;-) Also, a reminder as it relates to this topic: the annotation tool and anchor tags are going to be a part of 4.0, right? Annotation tool for marking errata and the anchor tags so I can like to a specific section of the license, eg 4(b). Greg -- | Greg Grossmeier GPG: B2FA 27B1 F7EB D327 6B8E | | http://grossmeier.net A18D 1138 8E47 FAC8 1C7D | _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
