So Jonas what do you propose. Would it be better to adjust XMP output of the chooser?
Cheers, Maarten -- Kennisland | www.kennisland.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra On Jun 11, 2013, at 18:36 , Nathan Yergler <[email protected]> wrote: > That's a great point, the formatting does conflate the creator and the > work a bit. > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Jonas Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Nathan! >> >> I'd be hard pressed to argue semantics with one of the ccREL authors :-) >> >> The specification is clear that attributionURL is "the URL to link to >> when providing attribution", which is a reference to the license >> requirement. I think what confuses it is that this is most often used, >> even in the ccREL examples, to refer to what can be interpreted as the >> URL of the attributionName. For example in the RDFa: >> >> This work by <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"; >> href="http://jonasoberg.net/"; property="cc:attributionName" >> rel="cc:attributionURL">Jonas Öberg</a> is licensed under a <a >> rel="license" >> href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_US";>Creative >> Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License</a>. >> >> Sincerely, >> Jonas >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Nathan Yergler <[email protected]> wrote: >>> How do you believe a web statement differs from the attribution URL, >>> functionally? >>> >>> IIRC a "web statement" is supposed to be a web accessible resource >>> that contains information about the rights, permissions, etc related >>> to the work. CC licenses state that the attribution URL only needs to >>> be cited with the work when it includes copyright information or >>> license notice (4(b)(iii) in >>> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode). So both need to >>> be web-accessible resources that contain license, copyright, or rights >>> information. I believe that was the basis for treating them as >>> synonyms. >>> >>> NRY >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Jonas Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> I was just made aware that in the license chooser, when a user enters >>>> a URL to attribute the work to, this is stored in different properties >>>> in the XMP and RDFa formats. In XMP, it's stored in >>>> xapRights:WebStatement and in RDFa it's stored in cc:attributionURL. I >>>> understand the difference between the two, but it's not clear to me >>>> why there is a difference between how the information from the license >>>> chooser is encoded in the various formats. >>>> >>>> It seems to me that there ought to be a separate field that allows a >>>> user to specify a WebStatement, and that the URL to attribute the work >>>> to should be encoded in the cc:attributionURL regardless of what >>>> format is used. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> Sincerely, >>>> Jonas >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> cc-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
