On 03/09/2015 05:34 AM, Maarten Zeinstra wrote: > What does the list suggest we do in this project? Should we adopt > CC:License or is it better to use odrs:RightsStatement or odrl:policy?
dcterms:RightsStatement IIRC CC stuck with license/License for PDM when that was introduced so that the (mostly theoretical, and likely doing regexps on a page rather than parsing RDF) consumer would not have to know about another property/class. But arguably CC REL ought have been (or ought be still) updated such that cc:license is a subproperty of dcterms:rights rather than dcterms:license and cc:License a subclass of dcterms:RightsStatement rather than dcterms:LicenseDocument. Again IIRC dcterms:RightsStatement and LicenseDocument did not exist until 2008. Had they existed in 2002, I guess the vocabulary CC introduced (later branded as CC REL) would have used one of them directly rather than introducing cc:License. Which brings us back to the answer to your question. Mike p.s. I'm using dcterms: for precision and because I note the EDM document does, though one of my super tiny pet peeves <http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2014/02/04/one-dc/> concerns never using DCES 1.1 for anything (all its terms are mirrored in dcterms) and thus only/always using dc: prefix for http://purl.org/dc/terms/ _______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
