On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 22:26:48 +0000 William S Fulton <w...@fultondesigns.co.uk> wrote:
> How about the new release is updated with the latest GPL - version 3? Given > you are changing the ccache version number quite considerably, this would > also be a good opportunity to update the license version to make it > distinguishable from prior releases. I'm fine with upgrading to GPLv3+ (and I'm also fine with keeping GPLv2+). If I understand these things correctly (please correct me otherwise), I could just switch ccache (the work as a whole) to GPLv3+ since all code parts that ccache is made from are GPLv3+ compatible. However, if upgrading, I would also prefer to relicense the "core ccache files", so that the blurb at the top of those files says GPLv3+ to avoid confusion. My understanding is that I need consent from all copyright holders (10-15 people if you count all contributors) to do this. Am I correct? If so, it seems easier to just stick with GPLv2+. Can anyone motivate me or correct me? :-) -- Joel _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache