We did some more experiments and found that it did indeed perform better with more OS file cache.
> it would be fairly insane if there was. That was basically my conclusion after reading Justin's reply. Thanks. On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Martin Pool wrote: I think Justin is right that there should be no copying; it would be fairly insane if there was. I would speculate that the cause is nothing to do with the cache, but rather just that on the larger machine, more of the source tree and the header files used by it can be kept in memory. You could try with tmpfs instead to see if it's different. Martin _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list ccache@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache