|
There were a lot of changes to interface-based processing
over time. MQC has added a lot of features and changed some of the order
of operations. Priority queuing came in long before that. So we may
simply see an evolution where newer routers/IOS versions are phasing that
out.
Anything you have in the real lab today goes through a
review process. Even when they bring old labs back and revise them,
there's still a review process to weed out things like that which no longer
exist.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J
IPExpert VP -
Curriculum Development
IPExpert Sr.
Technical Instructor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ipexpert.com
From: Jayagiri B Nair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 4:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Compressed TCP Hi
Scott Thanks for your reply.
Sorry for made the confusion. Actually the doubt came from WB 8.0, section 19,
QOS topic.In the priority queuing the question asks as
follows: Queue 1 Level:
High Protocol:
CompressedTCP Number of
packets: 25 And I could not see
compressedTCP as an option in my IOS. Anyway I have checked the answer and it
says, priority-list 1 protocol
compressedtcp low. Hope I can see this
option in the lab IOS as I am using an old IOS. Thanks for your other
explanations, given me more ideas on that. Rgds Jay From: Scott
Morris [mailto: I'm not sure I
understand the question. The compression will occur prior to a packet
getting into the queuing mechanisms. So it would really not appear as
anything in particular (other than an IP packet) AFAIK. Most importantly,
it wouldn't appear as anything really reachable. According to Cisco
docs, queuing isn't supported (use FIFO) when you are employing compression
mechanisms at the interface level. But (as always) there
is an exception/workaround for that. MQC supports header compression in
the queue-level. So in your policy map, you can state "compress header ip
tcp" after you have successfully matched what things you are or are not going to
compress. otherwise, you will be stuck with some method of
classifying/marking at a previous interface and just passing things
through. HTH, Scott Morris, CCIE4
(R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE
#153, CISSP, et
al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J IPExpert CCIE
Program Manager IPExpert Sr.
Technical Instructor http://www.ipexpert.com From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Jayagiri B
Nair Hi guys How we will say compressed TCP as a
flow in a priority queue? If through port, which port is
it? Thanks Jay Jayagiri
Nair Network
Administrator,
P O Box: 502211,
Tel:
+971-4-3677114 Fax:
+ 971-4-3677414 email:
jayagiri.nair@showtimearabia.com Note: |
- [OSL | CCIE_RS] Compressed TCP Jayagiri B Nair
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Compressed TCP Scott Morris
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Compressed TCP Jayagiri B Nair
- Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Compressed TCP Scott Morris

