Explain the concept of using NAT for RIP changes. It's evil. :) But it's a good mental exercise to go through! Here is an excerpt from the book: http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=330806&seqNum=31&rl=1
It really is a good book to go through the different thought processes of sitting through a CCIE lab! The labs are fairly entertaining too, but I think reading it from a candidate's mental state is a better idea! HTH, Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J IPExpert VP - Curriculum Development IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrea Riela Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 5:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] PBR -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jul 10, 2006, at 5:58 AM, Scott Morris wrote: > > I liken things like this to the CiscoPress book for R&S Labs written > by Maurillio Gorito (one of the proctors) where two devices run RIP > and you are told to make them use unicast, but do not use the > "neighbor" command. And the solution, while mentally painful, used > NAT as the answer in order to translate the multicast packets into > unicast ones. > Hi Scott, could you explain better that concept? Thanks for your support Regards Andrea -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEsherMakHrsrHP9wRAh34AJ9xF5JygA9dhnqyFlm57mdi5i8KzgCg6xir 5OmhIZd8cnFmO7FVAGrff3s= =Uw6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
