I found these configs on R9
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute connected metric-type 1 subnets
network 192.168.90.0 0.0.0.3 area 9
Which i think confirm that redistribute eigrp 1 under ospf was missing on R6.
Hope any misconvinience has been vanished
On 7/19/06, Mohamed Farouk <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The lab states "Ensure that mutual redistribution OSPF/EIGRP occurs on R5 and R6"Does this satisfy such requirements?Do you mean that this command :distribute-list 1 out eigrp 1" control routes going into EIGRP from OSPF?The access-list obtained in such command contains routes generated in the EIGRP domain not the OSPF one.We just need one answer to understand, redistribute eigrp 1 is missing or not?Thanks/regards
On 7/18/06, Scott Morris < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:distribute-list out eigrp can be misleading. While the command is PLACED under router OSPF, the EFFECT is actually in the EIGRP process. When you go to redistribute OSPF routes, and EIGRP says "Hey, give me your routes!", the distribute-list kicks in and filters exactly WHAT routes are going to be given.Note, I don't have the lab in front of me, so I'm giving you a general explanation of the command and why it may look like it does nothing here.HTH,Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al.CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-JIPExpert VP - Curriculum DevelopmentIPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] On Behalf Of Mohamed Farouk
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Lab 33 R6 Redistrbiution
HiI have noticed the following configuration on R6router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
area 0 authentication message-digest
network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 192.168.90.0 0.0.0.3 area 9
network 200.0.0.6 0.0.0.0 area 0
neighbor 192.168.90.2 priority 1
distribute-list 1 out eigrp 1Where is the redistribute eigrp 1 subnets in ospf 1, so that "distribute-list 1 out eigrp 1" has any value?It is very strange that i found a question about that in the certification talk site from WBv7 configs, and after the launching of WBv8 the same mistake is found?!Thanks/Regards
