I would think those answers (4 6 5 5) were incorrect. While it doesn't make a difference what number you put for queue 4 since it's "priority-queue".
But the others need to be in some ratio that makes sense. Now if your targets were 20%, 40% and 33% those numbers would vaguely work (6.66666666 being the least common denominator among them), but as they are that ratio makes no sense. :) So I'd answer it with your answer, or ask who was mathematically impaired. Now the question comes, is that one of our labs with that math? ;) Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE #153, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hidalgo Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] QOS on CAT3550 Hello people from the list. I have a question regarding QoS (WRR) on a Cat 3550. They are asking to provide the following % of bandwidth to the following Queues: Q1 = 27% Q2 = 40% Q3 = 33% Q4 = Priority! Now, according to my material the answer to this would be the following: wrr-queue bandwidth 4 6 5 5 Would an acceptable answer on the CCIE Lab Exam (and real world) to this be the following? wrr-queue bandwidth 27 40 33 1 (I know "1" is the lowest weight but Q4 is prioritized!) Thanks in advanced! ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Never Miss an Email Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail
