Look like that should work as you completed originally, except with a
few extra lines. Shaping to "all traffic" does not really require an
access list to complete, only when a network(s) are specified.

Router(config-if)#traffic-shape ?
  group  configure token bucket: group <access-list> CIR (bps) [Bc
(bits) [Be
         (bits)]] 
  rate   configure token bucket: CIR (bps) [Bc (bits) [Be (bits)]] 

You could also complete the requiremnets with MQC as you did, but this
would be a few extra lines.

There is also policing which probably would not work.

Router(config-if)#rate-limit input ?
  <8000-2000000000>  Bits per second
  access-group       Match access list
  dscp               Match dscp value
  qos-group          Match qos-group ID






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 13, Issue 4


Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Question on QOS (Tony Hidalgo)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:22:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Tony Hidalgo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question on QOS
To: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Hello people from the list.

I have a question regarding QOS that I came across:

They are asking to "shape" to 64K all traffic going
from R1 to R2 with the "minimum" amount of
lines/commands.

I configured an access-list to mark the traffic, then
a class-map (matching the ACL created before), then I
created a Policy map (this references the class-map
created) and then I entered the command: 
"shape average 64000". Of course at the end, I applied
it to the interface

When I saw their answer for this question, I noticed
that they just configured the following command under
the corresponding interface: 
"traffic-shape rate 64000"

In my mind, both do the same thing with the difference
that the second approach obviously has fewer
commands/lines.

I am correct on this?

Thanks in advanced!


 
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367


End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 13, Issue 4
**************************************

Reply via email to