Yes, I agree the B + D (bandwidth and delay) must be more equal on both links to supprt the variance. You either change bandwidth or delay to get the variance command to line up. Since your bandwidths will not be the same, that only leaves you with delay to change as Scott stated below.
> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: EIGRP variance (Scott Morris) > 2. Framerelay (mak) > 3. Re: Framerelay (Scott Morris) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 21:12:04 -0500 > From: "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP variance > To: "'Nicolas Vanderheyden'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Looks like your feasible distance may be too high. Only one is showing up > there in R7's table. Try tweaking your delay information on your > redistributes to be more equal. > > Scott > > _____ > > From: Nicolas Vanderheyden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 4:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: EIGRP variance > > > Hi Scott, > > Topology tables look like the following: > > #### > #R5# > #### > > P 200.0.0.4/32, 1 successors, FD is 1305600, tag is 200 > via Redistributed (2688000/0) > > #### > #R6# > #### > > P 200.0.0.4/32, 1 successors, FD is 281600, tag is 200 > via Redistributed (2585600/0) > > #### > #R7# > #### > P 200.0.0.4/32, 1 successors, FD is 2588160, tag is 200 > via 192.168.100.6 (2588160/2585600), FastEthernet0/0 > > Nicolas > > > On 3/3/07, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you have redistribution on both routers at the same time what does the > output from "show ip eigrp topology" look like? That's the RIB where we're > going to see the information showing up to make any sort of routing-table > decision from. > > HTH, > > > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE > #153, CISSP, et al. > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ipexpert.com > > > _____ > > From: Nicolas Vanderheyden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 12:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: EIGRP variance > > > > Hello people from the list, > > I'm trying to do load-balancing with EIGRP by modifying the variance but the > end router doesn't seem to enter both routes into its routing table. > > LAB is as follow: > > R5 ------ R6 > \ / > \ / > \ / > R7 > > Both R5 and R6 are redistributing routes learned via OSPF (running above R5 > and R6) into EIGRP. > > #### > #R5# > #### > router eigrp 1 > redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000 500 255 1 1500 > > #### > #R6# > #### > router eigrp 1 > redistribute ospf 1 metric 1000 100 255 1 1500 > > #### > #R7# > #### > > router eigrp 1 > variance 6 <--- a variance of 2 should have been enough but I tried higher > values even the max 128 but without success > network 192.168.11.4 0.0.0.3 > network 192.168.100.0 > network 200.0.0.7 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> > no auto-summary > > R7(config-router)#do sh ip protocol > Routing Protocol is "eigrp 1" > Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set > Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set > Default networks flagged in outgoing updates > Default networks accepted from incoming updates > EIGRP metric weight K1=1, K2=0, K3=1, K4=0, K5=0 > EIGRP maximum hopcount 100 > EIGRP maximum metric variance 6 > Redistributing: eigrp 1 > EIGRP NSF-aware route hold timer is 240s > Automatic network summarization is not in effect > Maximum path: 4 > Routing for Networks: > 192.168.11.4/30 > 192.168.100.0 > 200.0.0.7/32 > Routing Information Sources: > Gateway Distance Last Update > 192.168.100.5 90 00:22:32 > 192.168.100.6 90 00:22:32 > 192.168.11.6 90 00:23:48 > Distance: internal 90 external 170 > > When advertised only from R5: > > R7(config-router)#do sh ip route 200.0.0.4 > Routing entry for 200.0.0.4/32 > Known via "eigrp 1", distance 170, metric 2690560 > Tag 200, type external > Redistributing via eigrp 1 > Last update from 192.168.100.5 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:16 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 192.168.100.5, from 192.168.100.5, 00:00:16 ago, via FastEthernet0/0 > Route metric is 2690560, traffic share count is 1 > Total delay is 5100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1000 Kbit > Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes > Loading 1/255, Hops 1 > Route tag 200 > > When advertised from R6 and R5 > > Routing entry for 200.0.0.4/32 > Known via "eigrp 1", distance 170, metric 2588160 > Tag 200, type external > Redistributing via eigrp 1 > Last update from 192.168.100.6 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:01 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 192.168.100.6, from 192.168.100.6, 00:00:01 ago, via FastEthernet0/0 > Route metric is 2588160, traffic share count is 1 > Total delay is 1100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1000 Kbit > Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes > Loading 1/255, Hops 1 > Route tag 200 > > > The only way I managed to have both routes into R7 is when having the same > redistribute metrics on R5 and R6, but of course that was not the idea of > this lab. I also try to clear my neighbors a few times but I always got the > same result > > I'm probably missing something but I can't figure it out. If you have any > idea that could help me, that would be great. > > Nicolas > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20070303/598a08f2/ attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 12:43:20 +0500 > From: mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Framerelay > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Dear, > > I need some comprehensive documentation on how to convert a cisco router as > a framerelay switch if some has it send me. > > > Thanks > MAK > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20070304/892e67fe/ attachment-0001.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 07:56:57 -0500 > From: "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Framerelay > To: "'mak'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=170741 > <http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=170741&seqNum=7&rl=1> > &seqNum=7&rl=1 > http://www.tech-recipes.com/cisco_router_tips718.html > http://www.thebryantadvantage.com/Frame%20Relay%20Switch.htm > > HTH, > > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE > #153, CISSP, et al. > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-J > IPexpert VP - Curriculum Development > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.ipexpert.com > > > _____ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mak > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 2:43 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Framerelay > > > Dear, > > I need some comprehensive documentation on how to convert a cisco router as > a framerelay switch if some has it send me. > > > Thanks > MAK > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20070304/35bb3195/ attachment-0001.html > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 3 > ************************************** > --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using Endymion MailMan. http://www.endymion.com/products/mailman/
