Therefore with Network Point-to_Multipoint,I should use broadcast Keyword from spoke to the Hub,not spoke with other spoke, and on HUB with all DLCI?Is it correct? However in a Network of kink Point-to-Point,if I have used static statements,Should I use the broadcast Keyword? You said "create redundant traffic" Why?
-- This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the contents of this email. Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks, as they consider appropriate. Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard. ----- Original message ----- From: "kirsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 07:58:57 -0700 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 16 Mark, I believe R2 would be the "hub" router with three frame-relay map statements out to R4, R5, and R6. R4,R5, and R6 can have map statements back to R2 and each other with full reachability. Note only using the broadcast keyword from the spoke back to the hub and not going through the hub to another router. This would create redundant traffic at the hub. Routes from the hub R2 would have the broadcast keyword associated with all DLCI's. Possible Example DLCI for R6 to R4: Frame-relay map ip 150.50.123.4 602 (to R4) Frame-relay map ip 150.50.123.5 602 (to R5) Frame-relay map ip 150.50.123.2 602 broadcast (to R5) -Greg -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 16 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15 (Idris, Hashiru Aminu) 2. Re: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:31:23 -0700 (PDT) From: "Idris, Hashiru Aminu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15 To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Mark while i dont have the workbook , i believe describing the scenario might give some of us a better idea and we can offer some assistance. hash --------------------------------- Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20070322/4e7a20 29/attachment-0001.html ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:57:34 -0000 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15 To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Many thanks for responding, basically there are 4 routers (R4, R5, R6 and R2), they are all connected via the Frame Relay network. Question: Configure Frame Relay between R2, R4, R5 and R6. You may not use any subinterfaces. The Frame Relay switch is fully meshed. You are allowed to use three frame relay map statements on R2. The frame relay network should be a hub and spoke topology, with R2 as the hub. HINT: you may use PBR. All frame relay interfaces must be part of the 150.50.123.0/24 subnet, no subnetting is allowed. Regards, Mark Johnson ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Idris, Hashiru Aminu Sent: 22 March 2007 14:31 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 15 Mark while i dont have the workbook , i believe describing the scenario might give some of us a better idea and we can offer some assistance. hash ________________________________ Need Mail bonding? Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTE wOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&s id=396546091> for great tips from Yahoo! Answers <http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/index;_ylc=X3oDMTFvbGNhMGE3BF9TAzM5NjU0NTE wOARfcwMzOTY1NDUxMDMEc2VjA21haWxfdGFnbGluZQRzbGsDbWFpbF90YWcx?link=ask&s id=396546091> users. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20070322/3ddb40 10/attachment-0001.html End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 14, Issue 16 ***************************************
