1) The final configs are redistributing connected routes. Is the intent of this lab to provide reachability to ALL IP addresses or just the ones specified by NETWORK statements? I didn't redistribute the connected routes but I still have full reachability between all IP addresses in the NETWORK statements (i.e. I only used network statements on the networks that the lab asked for). I had to use NEXT-HOP-SELF in my neighbour statements in BGP, but it works. Does my solution fulfill the requirements? 2) The final configs don't address any routing loops. When I do successive SHOW IP ROUTES, the results on R5 and R6 don't stay consistent. When I do TRACEROUTES there are obvious loops. I put measures in my solution to avoid the loops all together and it seems to work fine. My question is, how do I know when I should implement loop avoidance during the exam? 3) I loaded the final configs as a test and I found 1 problem. Access-list 1 on R2 allows the even routes and denies the odds. This is opposite of the requirements. The 1st line is "access-list 1 permit 192.1.1.0 0.0.14.0" when it should be "access-list 1 permit 192.1.0.0 0.0.14.0"
