If you created a new process, did you remove the "network" command from the first process? It is possible to have it in both, but hopefully one is passive to reduce confusion! :)
Otherwise, you may simply need to watch your aging timers to see what's going on with it. Sometimes thing hang around longer than we intend them to! :) HTH, Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Olsen Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 5:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF database funny stuff Hi Everybody, Just a questing for the hardcore OSPF people. I have a scenario where my routers are connected link this. R1 ------ R2 ------ R4 ------- R5 ------- R6 ------ R9 All routers run OSPF AREA 0 on their interconnected links and R1, R2 and R4 have their loopbacks in Area 1, 2 and 4. Now I go and create a new OSPF process on R6 and R9 and changes the link between R6 and R9 to be Area 0 for the new process. The question is WHY do i still have the entries from R1, R2, R4, R5 in the OSPF database of R9? Is there a timer that the OSPF database follows? If i do a reload on R6 and R9 the database will come up clean with only R6 and R9 entries. I just can't seem to clear the database in any other way. /Ralph
