Ok so by adding the 'ip pim rp-address 200.0.0.4 10 override' command on R4 I'm telling that is the RP I assume?
As for the original question I assume I assume it looks ok? Jason Morris _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 6:20 PM To: Morris, Jason L.; [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] lab 15 The section in the proctor guide stating "technically impossible with today's IOS" is referring to the statement "without having R4 announce itself as the RP", since in newer IOS versions with static rp definitions, you still need the command on the device acting as the RP. With override configured, the definitions in the access-list will preempt what is dynamically learned for the group. Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec) Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab, CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. _____ From: Morris, Jason L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] lab 15 >From earlier (15.3)in the proc guide it says when talking about the ip pim rp-address command 'This is a difficult one to interpret, and actually is technically impossible with today's IOS.' The output below seems to support looking that the '200.0.0.4 (?)'. It looks like the RP for 224.44.44.44 is 200.0.0.1. Maybe I'm way off base... R5#show ip pim rp mapping PIM Group-to-RP Mappings Group(s) 224.11.11.11/32 RP 200.0.0.1 (?), v2v1 Info source: 200.0.0.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP Uptime: 01:46:16, expires: 00:02:17 Group(s) 224.11.11.12/32 RP 200.0.0.1 (?), v2v1 Info source: 200.0.0.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP Uptime: 01:46:16, expires: 00:02:16 Group(s) 224.11.11.13/32 RP 200.0.0.1 (?), v2v1 Info source: 200.0.0.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP Uptime: 01:46:16, expires: 00:02:17 Group(s) 224.44.44.44/32 RP 200.0.0.1 (?), v2v1 Info source: 200.0.0.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP Uptime: 01:31:16, expires: 00:02:17 Group(s) 224.88.88.88/32 RP 200.0.0.7 (?), v2v1 Info source: 200.0.0.2 (?), elected via Auto-RP Uptime: 01:02:21, expires: 00:02:17 Acl: 10, Static-Override RP: 200.0.0.4 (?) R5# Jason Morris _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 5:29 PM To: Morris, Jason L.; [email protected] Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] lab 15 When you say "doesn't work anyway", what specifically are you seeing to arrive at that conclusion? What are you seeing for the output of show ip pim rp mapping on your devices? Marvin Greenlee, CCIE #12237 (R&S, SP, Sec) Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits! Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab, CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. _____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morris, Jason L. Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 5:18 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] lab 15 I have a specific question about lab 15 task4. I'm not the least bit familiar with multicast so bear with me... the proc guide has you use the 'ip pim rp-address' on all other routers (which from what I see doesn't work anyway) I used the 'ip pim send-rp-announce' on R7... both ways correct? They seem to have accomplished the same thing... an I missing a requirement somewhere or? Jason Morris
