I can exclude this because already tried, however :
tra 150.50.5.69
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 150.50.5.69
1 150.50.100.6 8 msec
150.50.100.5 8 msec
150.50.100.6 8 msec
2 150.50.7.7 8 msec 12 msec 8 msec
3 150.50.5.69 8 msec * 8 msec
and so on, HUB goes always to 100.6
--
This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may
contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the contents of
this email.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of viruses,
the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
as they consider appropriate.
Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
----- Original message -----
From: "Brian Valentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:22:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest 6
Perhaps your router is using per-destination load balancing.
Packets to the same destination will always use the same outgoing
interface. Packets destined for another destination on the same
subnet would go out another interface.
For per-packet load balancing, I believe you would need to use
process switching. Try ?no ip route-cache?, but that could
potentially break other parts of your configuration? so consider
yourself duly warned.
Brian Valentine
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE_RS Digest 6
I` ve 3 path to same destination:
sh ip route 150.50.5.64
Routing entry for 150.50.5.64/27
Known via "eigrp 1", distance 90, metric 2684416, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 1, eigrp 2
Advertised by eigrp 2 metric 64 2000 255 1 1500
Last update from 150.50.100.5 on Serial0/1/0.256, 00:04:17 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
150.50.100.6, from 150.50.100.6, 00:04:17 ago, via
Serial0/1/0.256
Route metric is 2684416, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 40100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1544
Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 2
150.50.100.5, from 150.50.100.5, 00:04:17 ago, via
Serial0/1/0.256
Route metric is 2684416, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 40100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1544
Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 2
* 150.50.9.5, from 150.50.9.5, 00:04:17 ago, via Serial0/2/0
Route metric is 2684416, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 40100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1544
Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 2
R2#sh ip eigrp topology 150.50.5.64/27
IP-EIGRP (AS 1): Topology entry for 150.50.5.64/27
State is Passive, Query origin flag is 1, 3 Successor(s), FD is
2684416
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
150.50.100.5 (Serial0/1/0.256), from 150.50.100.5, Send flag is
0x0
Composite metric is (2684416/2172416), Route is Internal
Vector metric:
Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
Total delay is 40100 microseconds
Reliability is 255/255
Load is 1/255
Minimum MTU is 1500
Hop count is 2
150.50.100.6 (Serial0/1/0.256), from 150.50.100.6, Send flag is
0x0
Composite metric is (2684416/2172416), Route is Internal
Vector metric:
Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
Total delay is 40100 microseconds
Reliability is 255/255
Load is 1/255
Minimum MTU is 1500
Hop count is 2
150.50.9.5 (Serial0/2/0), from 150.50.9.5, Send flag is 0x0
Composite metric is (2684416/2172416), Route is Internal
Vector metric:
Minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
Total delay is 40100 microseconds
Reliability is 255/255
Load is 1/255
Minimum MTU is 1500
Hop count is 2
Someone can explain me why packets going on only 150.50.100.6?
Vector metric are equal or not ?
It would be work to all 3 path, at least for me.
Thanks for each furthest help.
--
This message is intended for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed an
d may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the addressee you must not read,use or disclose the conten
ts of this email.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to avoid the transmission of vi
ruses, the recipient should carry out virus and other checks,
as they consider appropriate.
Myself accepts no responsibility in this regard.
