Max-reserved-bandwidth will work as long as your policy doesn't exceed whatever bandwidth is on the line period!
So that's 1312K. Or roughly 85% of a T1's default bandwidth. HTH, Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:28 AM To: 'GAURAV MADAN'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CBWFQ when not enough bandwidth Hi, I think the max-reserved-bandwidth does not work since with this command you just specify that you can reserve for example 99% of the bandwidth. Per default you are not allowed to reserve more than 75% of the configured bandwidth. With the bandwidth command it works. I just verified that on my stack. I configured a FR interface with bandwith of 10Gig and then applied a service policy with total of 1Gig. The FR Interface is certainly not able to process that speed.... But do you think this will be realistic, to configure more than the interface is able to handle? Regards Roger Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von GAURAV MADAN Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. April 2008 14:15 An: [email protected] Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CBWFQ when not enough bandwidth Hi suppose we have following req : class A : 448 kbps class B : 384 class C : 256 class D : 128 class E : 96 if i apply the same in out direction on standard serial ( 1.54 mbps ) ; as expected i get error message saying bandwidht not enough .. so we do have 2 option : 1) to change "max-reserved-bandwidth" 2) to change bandwidth using "bandwidth" cli if nothing is given in question ; is one preferred over other ? or can we use any Gaurav Madan
