It could very well be a change that does actually allow that to occur. Did the command take on your 2811's?
Previously though, it was to illustrate a line of thinking even though the command wouldn't take. Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: Suresh Mishra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 3:43 PM To: Gary Duncanson Cc: [email protected]; Scott Morris Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] hold queue on WFQ My typo error. Its task no 12.8 not 12.5. Suresh On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Gary Duncanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suresh, > > I don't have or use the proctor guide. Which lab number is this from > workbook v 9.0? > > Thanks > Gary > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Suresh Mishra" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 8:08 PM > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] hold queue on WFQ > > > > > > I am not sure if it may be the answer. The LAB task 12.5 requires > > us to put a limit on the number of packest for all the queue's in a > > WFQ system to 800. > > > > However, The proctor guide says that we need to use fair-queue > > aggregate-limt command for this which is only available on 7500. So > > we can not do this for 2800 routers. > > > > However, I was going through the cisco doc and found this command > > called "hold-queue limit" which sets the limit on the total number > > of packets for the WFQ in all the queue's > > > > I just like to have a confirmation about this as this sounds to me > > like the real answer. > > > > Thanks > > Suresh > > > >
