Not necessarily true. Remember since it's no partial credit, you could MOSTLY have section 1 working, but miss something small, therefore 0 points. If it's POSSIBLE to have section 2 working based on your config/requirements, then you'll still get those points.
But as an example, if you screwed up frame-relay links and it wasn't working AT ALL, then you can't possible get points for OSPF over Frame (or anything else) because it will not possibly function no matter how good your config looks! HTH, Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 http://www.ipexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: Matt Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 10:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Louis S; osl Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE point myth? If I could just add one more thing... You may have a section dependent on a previous section. Lets say OSPF to make it easy... Question 1 (4 pts): Configure OSPF to advertise networks ABCD in Area x Question 2 (2 pts): Configure md5 authentication in area x. If you miss out (lets say) network C in Q1, you score zero points in it. You will also score zero points for Q2 as the dependency is also not working. We can take this further again: Question 10 BGP (4 points). Establish EBGP between R1 in network C and R6 in Network Z Make sure x,y,x occurs etc Now... as network C was not advertised in OSPF to begin with at the start, C is unreachable and hence Q10 wont work. Even if all config is correct in Q10, if it doesnt work, you score zero for that question. So in summary: That one typo or whatever it was for Q1 didnt just cost you 4 points there, it also cost 6 more points in Q2 and Q10 because they rely on Q1 to work properly.H HTH Cheers, Matt CCSI #31207 PS Scott, please pass on my regards to Jared when he rocks up. We used to work together :) On 04/05/2008, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That thought process IS true. However, in the real lab, you will find > the point sections are 1, 2, 3 or potentially 4 points. You will NOT > have a single 10-point section. > > We are redoing things a bit to get rid of that thinking. You aren't > the first person to wonder about that! > > > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, > JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al. > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc. > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > http://www.ipexpert.com > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louis S > Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 1:47 PM > To: osl > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] CCIE point myth? > > My understanding is that the lab exam is similar to how the ipexpert > labs are layed out, in the sense that the test is broken up into > sections and each of those sections has a point value. > > Is it true that say for instance in section "x" marked as "10 > points"... if there are multiple tasks in this section and you get > one of them wrong you loose all 10 points?!? > > Not sure if this violates NDA, if so then just let me know. > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______ > ________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ > >
