I agree with you in that we can ignore the falling threshold if it was possible to configure the alarm without a falling threshold. But the problem is that router will not allow to enter the command without a falling threshold value. So we must have to guess some value there .
Thanks Suresh On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Roger RPF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Suresh, > > In that particular example, there is no falling threshold since it is not > asked to generate a LOG message due to a falling event. > > "The alarm should be triggered when there is an increase of 100 or more of > the MIB variable. ....it should trigger an RMON event." > > So the question does not ask you to also generate an event when a falling > threshold is crossed. For sure, you could configure it, but it is not asked. > > Well, that's how I understood the question. > > regards > > Roger > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Suresh Mishra > Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. Mai 2008 23:09 > An: OSL CCIE Routing and Switching Lab Exam; Scott Morris > Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_RS] RMON > > Hi Scott, > > I am trying to configure the LAB 16 task 5. It requires the > configuration of rmon alarm. The rising threshold is given but falling > threshold is not given. What should the criteria for best guess in > these situations. > > > Thanks > Suresh > >
