I'm going to assume that your message is regarding v9 of the labs (or earlier) as I can only find two instances of the word "however" in the new version of the labs and neither have anything to do with redistribute connected! I unfortunately do not have the v9 labs on my laptop, so I can't really reference the rest of the context there. Neither redistribute connected nor passive interface will allow any peering to be formed. So if that was the goal, they will both accomplish it just fine! One will bring routes in as internal, the other as external. HTH, Scott
_____ From: Carlos Valero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:30 AM To: 'OSL CCIE Routing and Switching Lab Exam'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] EIGRP Question Hi, In the EIGRP Lab I found a statement that is confusing me a little bit. I believe it is a mistake. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding it. Here it is: "If we can't use passive interface, then "redistribute connected" would be the next obvious choice. However, with that, R4 will never form a peer with anyone on the LAN" What I understand is that "redistribute connected" would NOT allow R4 to form a peer with anyone on the LAN! Of course "passive interface" would not allow that (that is, forming a peer relationship) But "redistribute connected" ??? I don't know. Am I misunderstanding, or is there something I don't know about "redistribute connected" ? Thank you! --- On Mon, 6/9/08, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
