I agree with this assessment.

If investing too much is an issue, then I would at least use 2611 instead of 
2501.

A 2611 with 64/16 can run 12.4 (12.4 5.a  to be precise).  And they 
provide 2 Ethernet ports!

2611's are not expensive at all; less that $50.  Although they may be hard 
to find.

If I were you, I would try to sell those 2501 (there is still a market for 
them) and try to get 2611's or 2621's

I think you would spend no more than an additional $300 in the process.

Just a thought.




--- On Tue, 6/10/08, Tony Schaffran (GS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Tony Schaffran (GS) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Rack rentals
To: "'OSL CCIE Routing and Switching Lab Exam'" 
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008, 10:46 PM



 
I would not get too comfortable with that list of equipment 
you have listed that you are studying with in your basement for $1000.00.  
There is no 12.4 for the 2500's.
 
It may be ok if you are studying CCNA or CCNP, but I am 
affraid you are missing a lot more than just 20% of all the features required 
to 
study for the CCIE.
 

Tony 
Schaffran 
Network 
Analyst 
CCIE 
#11071 
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA, 
 
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, 
MCSE 
  
www.cconlinelabs.com 
Your #1 choice 
for online Cisco rack rentals.  
 
 



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian K 
Valentine
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:17 PM
To: 'OSL CCIE 
Routing and Switching Lab Exam'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Rack 
rentals




Personally, I built a “poor man’s” rack and set it up in my 
basement.  It has  eight 2500 series routers (mostly 2501s).  I 
also have  a couple of 2924 switches  and a 1700 series router that 
is 
doing “router on a stick” so that my  switches can act somewhat like they 
know how to route.    At the heart of the whole thing is a 2522 
router that acts like a frame-relay switch.  Then I have a 2511 Router 
that 
allows console into all the other equipment.  Got all the routers maxed 
out 
at 16MB flash, 16MB sdram.  I’d estimate that I’m able to get about 80% of 
the technologies working.  It runs OSPF, RIP, EIGRP, and BGP just fine. 
So, 
that should get me pretty far.  After a little digging for the right IOS 
version, I’ve even been able to get IPv6 running!  I put it all together 
including cabling and a full 72” rack for about $1000.  Got most of the 
parts on ebay and a couple off of craigslist. 
   
I realize that it is not going to get me all the way to where 
I need to be, but it lets me work on my own schedule.  It even lets me 
have 
access to it spontaneously.  I also am a family man.  I can spend an 
hour or two or three on it anytime I wish.  Then I can rent rack space on 
the weekends when I can carve out 8 or 10 hours straight to dedicate to 
studying.    I’ve also tried playing around with dynmips a 
little, but have found that I prefer my old-school hardware for the most part. 
 
   
HTH, 
   
Brian Valentine  
   
   
   

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rogelio 
Gamino
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 7:44 PM
To: 
[email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Rack 
rentals 
   


I've been using Dynamips but as we all know it has some 
limitations.  

  

Are you all using Proctor Labs? Is there another option? 
During the work week the only slot I could use from Proctol Labs is the one 
starting at midnight but then I wouldn't get any sleep before going to 
work.   

  

It would be nice if the slots were staggered so that they had 
slots every 4 hours. I don't want to limit myself to the 4pm to midnight on 
weekends. During the work week I could use their racks if they started around 
8pm, finish around 4am, sleep a couples of hours and then go to 
work. 

  

Not complaining, just looking for options. The CCIE lab is 
difficult as it is so it would be nice if I could find an option that would 
better fit into a married /w children, working person's 
schedule. 

  

Thanks, 

RG 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 
8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008 7:22 
AM


      

Reply via email to