Since LLQ is based on CBWFQ (configuration wise), there are basically no practical differences between LLQ and CBWFQ.
Many consider LLQ a special case of CBWFQ. I see it that way too. As you know, the only difference is that LLQ uses the "priority" keyword instead of "bandwidth" Of course there are a few functional differences between these 2 options. But my point is that in many cases these 2 terms are used interchangeably. Therefore, if the Lab states "convert priority queueing to CBWFQ", I would take it as LLQ. CV. --- On Thu, 6/12/08, Suresh Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Suresh Mishra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 17 task 7 To: "Scott Morris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "OSL CCIE Routing and Switching Lab Exam" <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008, 3:45 PM Hello all, This task requires that we convert priority queueing to CBWFQ. Well it does not say that we need LLQ. P.G guide uses CBWFQ as well. However, I would assume that LLQ would be the right migration for priority queuing. CBWFQ would be good for custom queuing. Thanks Suresh
