Well,
A really quick answer would be to not worry about it.  The lab
blueprint states that only version 2 is tested.  Version 1 is no
longer tested.

But also if the process is configured as rip version 2 and you are
sending version 2 out an interface you don't need anything configured
on the interface.  Only if you are switching the version from what is
configured under the process.

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Roger RPF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> Question regarding RIPv1 and RIPv2. Following setup
>
> --<R1 RIPv2>---<RIPv2 R2 RIPv1>---<RIPv1 R3>--
>
> If I have to configure RIPv2 between R1 and R2 but RIPv1 between R2 and R3.
> I do the following setup on R2:
>
> router rip
> version 2
> no auto-summary
> network <towards R1>
> network <towards R3>
>
> interface towards R3
> ip rip send version 1
> ip rip receive version 1
> <rest of the config>
>
> Is there a good reason why I should configure on the interface towards R1,
> on my RIPv2 connection, ip rip send version 2?
> I don't see a reason, because I've already configured version 2 under the
> main process but maybe I'm missing something.
>
> Can anyone give me the "absolution" in this?? **smile**
>
> regards
>
> Roger
>
>



-- 
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.

Reply via email to