The fact that you are creating the MFR interface and putting "encap frame mfr 1" on the physical interfaces is the equivalent of the "ppp multilink group 1" command set for PPP. So you are essentially doing the same basic thought process, just slightly different commands. HTH, Scott
_____ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Meraz, Richard Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 2:58 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol1 Sect6 Task 6.17 A little clarification if you don't mind. I thought MFR was similar to PPP multilink in that you could essentially bond two circuits. But, after doing Task 6.17 with the two point to point MFR subinterfaces, there is no corresponding "multilink"/bonding type command. Does this multilink functionality happen simply because both physical interfaces reference MFR 1? Rich
