Great! That was the part I was missing/misunderstood.  Thanks!!

 

________________________________

From: Tyson Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 8:04 AM
To: Meraz, Richard; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol Sect 5 Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol

 

That is not the only option but is one of three.

 

In the 3560 you can apply the command

 

Mtu system routing 1500

 

On a 3550 and 3560 you can say

Int svi X

Mtu 1500

 

Either of those options can also be used.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.


Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

 

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.


 

________________________________

From: Meraz, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:02 AM
To: Tyson Scott; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol Sect 5 Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol

 

Thanks Tyson. 

 

So to be sure I got this correct (and to add on to a latter lab), if I
do increase the MTU to say 1504, then my SVI will also be 1504, and
therefore a router's interface, while running OSPF, will go down.  If
I'm correct in that statement, is my only option to fix my router to use
ip ospf mtu-ignore if my MTU must stay at 1504 to support either L2
Tunneling or QinQ?

 

________________________________

From: Tyson Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 7:53 AM
To: Meraz, Richard; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol Sect 5 Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol

 

It isn't required.  You will notice the l2-tunnel will probably work
without doing it.  But it is best practice to increase the MTU to
account for the extra header.

 

Regards,

 

Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S and Security

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.


Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 
Cell: +1.248.504.7309
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities

 

IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video On
Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S
Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and
CCIE Storage Lab Certifications.


 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Meraz, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol Sect 5 Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol

 

When we configure the switchport with the command l2protocol-tunnel to
support CDP between BB1 and R1, do we also need to change the MTU size,
or rephrased, does L2 tunneling between switches require an MTU change
from 1500 to 1504?

 

Thanks,

Rich  

 

Reply via email to