Jeremy, A router connected to two broadcast segments (same area or not) does not need to be DR for both. What errors are you getting?
Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:26 PM, prakash patel <[email protected]>wrote: > I would focus on errors. > > What type of errors ? > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:23:16 -0400 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Mock Lab Question > > > I have created a mock lab, and think I have the solution but want to see > what you guys think. The scenario is I have R2, R4 and R6 in an > OSPF broadcast setup over FR. R2 is the DR, 4 & 6 priority 0. They are in > area 0. > > Now then I decided to put R2, R3, and R4 (over Ethernet) into area 0 but > made R3 the DR for that area 0 and setting the priority's on the R2 and R4 > links to 0 to to see what would happen. Of course started getting a whole > bunch of errors. > > So basically R2 had two area 0's but was only DR for one of them. > > So the only solution I could come up with was to use different OSPF > processes. Is there another way to get around the DR fighting? Using tunnels > and virtual links maybe? > > > > Jeremy Furr [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits. Check > it > out.<http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009> > --
