The particular version really does not matter anyway. If you know the stream and feature set then nothing is going to change anyway. T trains of course might have something here and there but put your money on the fact you will be getting code in maintenance mode...
ie - you are far more likely to get something like 12.4(14)T8 than you would some awful piece of rubbish like 12.4(1)T. FWIW - I honestly don't remember what my IOS version was in my exam. As I have mentioned it does not matter either. Also, 12.4(14)Tx is my favourite IOS at the moment. Go forth and deploy - its my money to become 12.5 mainline. Cheers, Matt CCIE #22386 CCSI #31207 2009/6/12 Jared Scrivener <[email protected]>: > I was informed by a proctor that the specific IOS version (outside of the > information published on the website) is restricted by NDA. I ask that > nobody posts a response to this please. Sorry, Carlos. > > > On 6/11/09 1:35 PM, "Carlos Valero" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Forgot to mention that I think it is supposed to be 12.4T > > But that's way too broad. > > Question is, do you know if there is any "particular IOS version"? > > > Thank you! > > > > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Carlos Valero <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IOS Version in the 'Real' CCIE Lab Exam?? > To: [email protected], "Jared Scrivener" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:34 PM > > Does anybody know which IOS version is currently being used in the Real CCIE > Lab Exam? > > Thank you! > > > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Jared Scrivener <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Jared Scrivener <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Lab2 Task6.6--Redistribution > To: "desmond Black" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 10:32 AM > > Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Lab2 Task6.6--Redistribution When redistributing a > tagged route it loses its existing tag by default. The match & set statement > is used to ensure a tag is preserved if it was already set at another point > of redistribution. The style of route-map below ensures that you NEVER have > routing loops if you assign each protocol its own tag and use a policy like > this for redistribution every time you redistribute. > > > On 6/11/09 3:01 AM, "desmond Black" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Although the task seems simple enough it sort of confused me in the sense > that, I can understand that Denying of the tags, but then the MATCH & SET of > the same tag in permit 10 statement as the one below didnt quite get to me. > > R5(config)#route-map E2R deny 5 > R5(config-route-map)#match tag 25 > R5(config-route-map)#route-map E2R permit 10----------| > R5(config-route-map)#match tag 58 > |----------Didnt get this section here > R5(config-route-map)#set tag 58--------------------------| > R5(config-route-map)#route-map E2R permit 15 > R5(config-route-map)#set tag 20 > > Cheers, > > Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP > Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] > > > > > > > Cheers, > > Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP > Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Mailto: [email protected] >
