Man, the best is Proctor Labs, think they hace a 2 for 1 option on at the 
moment, so it works out very cheep. 7h 45 min sessions. Go go go.

--------------------------------------------------
From: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 5:08 PM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 43, Issue 104

> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Rack Rental Recommendation - IEWB-RS Lab Scenario (Rik Ryder)
>   2. Re: Help with OSPF (Nhan Duong)
>   3. Re: Rack Rental Recommendation - IEWB-RS Lab Scenario
>      (Adrian Brayton)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:48:04 +0100
> From: Rik Ryder <[email protected]>
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Rack Rental Recommendation - IEWB-RS Lab
> Scenario
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> Would somebody kindly recommended a good value, reliable rack rental 
> service
> which offers the IEWB-RS Lab Scenario. Value is key as i'm not working at
> the moment and the cash flow is alittle tight at the moment. Ideally i'd
> like 6-8 hours slots but will consdier all options.
>
> Thanks all,
>
> Rik
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090819/7ec28e2c/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:05:26 -0400
> From: Nhan Duong <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Help with OSPF
> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
>
> Soloman,
>
>
>
> Thanks for responded to my post.
>
>
> Everything else understandable. However, I kinda remember that I have 
> issue with "access list can not filter traffic originating from the 
> router"
>
>
>
> So I guest we can create a route-map match acl and interface -> then drop 
> that traffic.
>
>
>
> Apply this service policy-map to global on the router.
>
>
>
> What do you think of this?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Nhan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:45:38 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Help with OSPF
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
> I have the following comments.
>
> Scenario 1
>
>
> interface fa0/1 will not send and receive ospf and 10.10.20.0 network will 
> not be advertised by ospf.
>
> Scenario 2
> nterface fa0/1 will not send ospf and adjacency can not be formed with 
> this interface. But note that 10.10.20.0 will be advertised.
>
> Scenario 3
>
> two points here
> - in standard access list protocol can not be specified
> - access list can not filter traffic originating from the router
>
>
> Rs
>
> Solomon
>
>
>
>
> From: Nhan Duong <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 4:06:25 PM
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Help with OSPF
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please help to verify these scenarios
>
> =======Scenario 1==============
> -----------R1---------------------
>
> int f0/0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> int f0/1
> ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0
>
> router ospf 1
> no auto
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
> -----------------------------------
> "network" is controlling which interface to join ospf.  Which mean int 
> f0/1 wills not send or receive any ospf?
>
> =======Scenario 2 ===============
>
> -----------R1---------------------
>
> int f0/0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> int f0/1
> ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0
>
> router ospf 1
> no auto
> network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
> passive int f0/1
>
> -----------------------------------
> "network" will allow 10.10/16 to join ospf, however "passive int f0/1" 
> wills stop the int f0/1 to send ospf.
>
> ======== Scenario 3 ============
>
> -----------R1---------------------
>
> int f0/0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> int f0/1
> ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0
> access-group 1 out
>
> access-list 1 deny ip 224..0.0.5 any
> access-list 1 deny ip 224.0.0.6 any
> access-list 1 deny ip any 224.0.0.5
> access-list 1 deny ip any 224.0.0.6
> access-list 1 permit ip any
>
> router ospf 1
> no auto
> network 10.10.0.0 0.0.255.255
>
> -----------------------------------
> "network" will allow 10.10/16 to join ospf, however "access-list 1" wills 
> stop the int f0/1 to send or receive ospf.
>
> ======== Scenario 4 =============
>
> -----------R1---------------------
>
> int f0/0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> int f0/1
> ip address 10.10.20.1 255.255.255.0
> access-group 1 out
>
> access-list 1 deny ospf any any
> access-list 1 permit ip any
>
> router ospf 1
> no auto
> network 10.10.10.0 0.0.255.255
>
> -----------------------------------
> "network" will allow 10.10/16 to join ospf, however "access-list 1" deny 
> ospf protocol..
>
>
>
> Hotmail? is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. Try it 
> now.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you?re up to on 
> Facebook.
> http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090819/a9507d55/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:08:25 -0400
> From: Adrian Brayton <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Rack Rental Recommendation - IEWB-RS Lab
> Scenario
> To: Rik Ryder <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hey Rik,
> When you look at value, you have to look at all aspects... IPexpert
> has the hardware (2811's) / IOS that will let you work on MPLS and all
> of the new stuff on the lab. Don't be surprised when you type in "mpls
> ip" and you get an error at "reliable rack rental"... Do your research
> and I am sure the best value will become quite apparent!
>
> HTHs
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Rik Ryder wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would somebody kindly recommended a good value, reliable rack rental
>> service which offers the IEWB-RS Lab Scenario. Value is key as i'm
>> not working at the moment and the cash flow is alittle tight at the
>> moment. Ideally i'd like 6-8 hours slots but will consdier all
>> options.
>>
>> Thanks all,
>>
>> Rik _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 43, Issue 104
> ****************************************
> 
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to