If you have 2 or more ASBR's [receiving & therefore] advertising the same
Prefix [with same cost] into OSPF but are at different locations you
wouldn't want to traffic to go through the one that is farther [in OSPF
internal cost terms].........then you use OE1. Obviously there are many
other scenarios wherein one would use this OE1, but this is a simple &
Practical one.


Desmond Black,
In Pursuit of CCIE!!
India

----- Original Message -----
From: "Taqdir Singh"
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Fw: OSPF OE1 vs OE2
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:13:24 +0530 (IST)





OSPF Type 5

OE1 - Cost to ASBR + Cost from ASBR to destination
OE2 - Cost from ASBR to destination (default)

Could any1 share scenario where we we use OE1 ?
Sincerely,
Taqdir Singh
91-9911709496
Do today what others won't So you can live tomorrow what others can't




----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Taqdir Singh
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 6:24:26 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSPF OE1 vs OE2




OSPF Type 5

OE1 - Cost to ASBR + Cost from ASBR to destination
OE2 - Cost from ASBR to destination (default)

Could any1 share scenario where we prefer to use OE1 ?
Sincerely,
Taqdir Singh
91-9911709496
Do today what others won't So you can live tomorrow what others can't

________________________________
Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer
8.
________________________________
See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out
Yahoo! Buzz.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
please visit www.ipexpert.com

-- 
Be Yourself @ mail.com!
Choose From 200+ Email Addresses
Get a Free Account at www.mail.com!

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to