I've gotten in the habit of keeping my frame interfaces shut down until they are completely configured with 'no frame inverse-arp'.
-mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Astorino [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:44 PM To: Michael Lipsey; [email protected]; CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSFP vs Frame Relay Point to Multipoint Just remember to only use dlcis given in the diagram. ------Original Message------ From: Michael Lipsey To: [email protected] To: [email protected] To: CCIE OSL Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSFP vs Frame Relay Point to Multipoint Sent: Aug 21, 2009 11:36 PM No, I'm not (in this case). I'm good. In the past I have but I those networks were broadcast - I have come to realize over the last few days that I haven't practiced NBMA enough. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: Joe Astorino [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 8:01 PM To: Michael Lipsey; [email protected]; CCIE OSL Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSFP vs Frame Relay Point to Multipoint You should only need neighbors from the hub to each spoke not spoke to spoke. If you are getting spoke to spoke peerings you need to find out why. Make sure you are not getting automagical frame connectivity Regards, Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: "Michael Lipsey" <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:45:49 To: <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] OSFP vs Frame Relay Point to Multipoint _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Regards, Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
