Ken,

Corinth#show ip route
Gateway of last resort is 172.16.3.1 to network 10.0.0.0
R* 0.0.0.0/0 [120/1] via 172.16.3.1, 00:00:17, Serial0

The first one is achieved with the "ip default-gateway" command
And the second is a default route that is advertised with RIP.


-- 
Regards,

Iwan Hoogendoorn
CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Hagen, Ken <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I'm pounding my head on this one. Maybe someone can help me. I working on ip
> default-network, and in the book the routes are like this:
>
> Code View: Scroll / Show All
>
> Corinth#show ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate default
> U - per-user static route
> Gateway of last resort is 172.16.3.1 to network 10.0.0.0
> D* 10.0.0.0/8 [90/2195456] via 172.16.3.1, 00:02:32, Ethernet0
> 172.16.0.0/16 is subnetted, 6 subnets
> C 172.16.4.0 is directly connected, Ethernet1
> C 172.16.5.0 is directly connected, Serial0
>
> D 172.16.1.0 [90/1811456] via 172.16.3.1, 00:00:17, Ethernet0
> D 172.16.6.0 [90/921600] via 172.16.3.1, 00:00:16, Ethernet0
> D 172.16.2.0 [90/793600] via 172.16.3.1, 00:00:16, Ethernet0
> C 172.16.3.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> R* 0.0.0.0/0 [120/1] via 172.16.3.1, 00:00:17, Serial0
>
>
>
> I have never had two default network statements like this in a route table.
> I have rip and eigrp configured on the routers and ip default-network
> configured, but I do not get these results. If I configure rip I can get the
> default network for rip, and when I configure eigrp I can get the default
> network for eigrp, but with both, I only get the default network for eigrp,
> which is what I expect because eigrp has the lower administrative distance.
> Is it possible to have both default networks in the routing table as this
> shows? Anyone have any ideas on what I'm doing wrong? What am I missing
> here?
>
>
>
> Ken Hagen CCNP
> Department of Information Technology
> City of Seattle
>
> W: (206) 386-1503
> C: (206) 255-8391
>
> E: [email protected]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to