Hi Rick : Please see my first post .. route 172.16.10.0 is a vpn route see below.. the thing is I am not sure whether this route should show in mpls forwarding table on R2 ??
R0#show mpls forwarding-table vrf cust1 Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface *17 Aggregate 172.16.10.0/24[V] 3952 *R0# On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Rick Mur <[email protected]> wrote: > Because that is not a VPN route, it's a local route, which is not in the > MPLS forwarding table. Only the VPNv4 prefixes are shown there. As you can > see your traffic is perfectly label switched. > -- > > Regards, > > Rick Mur > CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) > Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Taqdir Singh > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> R2#traceroute vrf cust1 172.16.10.1 source loopback 1 >> >> Type escape sequence to abort. >> Tracing the route to 172.16.10.1 >> >> 1 10.10.20.1 [MPLS: Labels 16/17 Exp 0] 40 msec 152 msec 164 msec >> 2 172.16.10.1 168 msec 88 msec * >> R2#show mpls for vrf cust1 *<<< I am again >> repeating my question , why route 172.16.10.0 is not here ?? >> * >> Local Outgoing Prefix Bytes tag Outgoing Next Hop >> tag tag or VC or Tunnel Id switched interface >> 19 Aggregate 172.16.20.0/24[V] <http://172.16.20.0/24%5BV%5D> 1168 >> R2# >> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Rick Mur <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> What is the problem? As long as you don't see a 'No Label' everything is >>> good. You also have connectivity in the VPN, so it's definitely label >>> switched. Try doing a traceroute and see if you get a label somewhere. >>> -- >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Rick Mur >>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) >>> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. >>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Solomon Ayele <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> I do not think you are right b/c the IGP is required only to provide >>>> connectivity for BGP >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* Kaj Niemi <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* Taqdir Singh <[email protected]> >>>> *Cc:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2009 9:36:56 AM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] not getting vpn route in mpls forwarding >>>> table >>>> >>>> Redesign your IGP using OSPF or ISIS instead of EIGRP to begin with. >>>> EIGRP >>>> is supported as a PE-CE routing protocol only. >>>> >>>> >>>> Kaj >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> > From: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]> >>>> > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:33:29 -0700 >>>> > To: <[email protected]> >>>> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] not getting vpn route in mpls forwarding >>>> table >>>> > >>>> > I am strugglig with this.. please help me out.. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Taqdir Singh >> CCNP- (R), CCNA >> 09911709496 >> >> Do today what others won't so you can live tomorrow as others can't >> > > -- Taqdir Singh CCNP- (R), CCNA 09911709496 Do today what others won't so you can live tomorrow as others can't
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
