Rob, I think offset-list would be fine. Remember when you alter interface parameters, especially bandwidth you may impact other protocols or configurations (e.g. qos).
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Rob <[email protected]> wrote: > I was working on Vol 3 Lab 3 Question 3.2. I configured my lab slightly > different then the way it is in the Proctor guide. Now I am starting to > think of a reason my solution may come back and bite me later. Here is > what I did: > > > > I used an offset list in that was applied to the Ethernet port so that it > is slightly higher in it’s metric > > I configured a variance of 2 to it would balance between the two (and it > does) > > Configured traffic share so traffic will only use only the serial > connection, yet still show both in the routing table (as per the question) > > > > That appears to work with just the single route. > > > > Now the Proctor guide did it by changing the bandwidth and delay of the > Ethernet connection instead of the off set list > > > > My question is this: is there a configuration out there that would make > min fail since I have a set offset value? Currently I believe that the > metric between the two routers are always the same and it really does not > matter what is behind each. If I send a route through EIGRP and it uses > that link then it will add the same values to the metric and it will > still work. > > > > > > Guess I am just second guessing my self but would like someone else’s > thought on the topic > > > > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
