Hi Rick, I found the issue. After doing some debugs I noticed the following error messages:
*Mar 1 00:05:54.131: %DUAL-6-EVENT: IP-EIGRP(0), 236 Rtmap intag too big, intag: 300 *Mar 1 00:05:54.131: %DUAL-6-EVENT: IP-EIGRP(0), 237 Rtmap intag too big, intag: 300 For some reason it complained and I changed the tag to 50 from 300 and it has taken it straight away. Have you or anyone seen this one before? I am using IOS 12.4(15)T7 - Advanced IP Services and would have thought it being the latest and greatest I should not have the issue. Really interesting one and it had me going for a few hours. Cheers, Vikas. On 11/8/09, Vikas Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rick, > > Yes, the routes are fully advertised on by the second router out f0/0 > interface. No issues with reachability and I see a full list of eigrp > routes on my telco router. Only that the tagging is not happening on > one router but fine on the other. I'll try to reapply the route map > and then reload and let you know. Otherwise I'm stumped. > > Cheers, > > Vikas > > Sent from my iPod > > On 08/11/2009, at 6:58 PM, Rick Mur <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is no limitation in Dynamips for this. Are you sure the routes >> are getting advertised by that second router out the Fa0/0 >> interface? If that is happening, try re-applying the route-map or >> even reload the router. >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Rick Mur >> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) >> Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >> >> On 8 nov 2009, at 06:51, Vikas Sharma wrote: >> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> I would greatly appreciate if you could let me know if there's some >>> limitation in GNS in terms of how many routers I can apply an route- >>> map to tag routes. For example, I have the following 2 route-maps >>> on each of my "Client-Routers" and the route-maps first match an >>> access list but do not do anything. The second line in each route- >>> map then sets a tag. The intention is, do not tag locally defined >>> subnets on the router but tag everything else. This route map is >>> then attached using the distribute-list route-map command in my >>> EIGRP routing process. The tags are supposed to show up on the >>> "Telco_Routers". What I see is no matter what I do, only 1 of my >>> "Client-Routers" does the tagging - the other one simpy does not. >>> I've checked my configs and there's really no difference; it's just >>> bizarre that only one router does the tagging. The route-maps are >>> correctly applied. >>> >>> On Client-Router1 >>> >>> route-map SETTAG permit 10 >>> match ip address 10 >>> ! >>> route-map SETTAG permit 20 >>> set tag 300 >>> ! >>> router eigrp 20 >>> distribute-list route-map SETTAG out FastEthernet0/0 >>> >>> On Client-Router2 >>> >>> route-map SETTAG permit 10 >>> match ip address 10 >>> ! >>> route-map SETTAG permit 20 >>> set tag 200 >>> ! >>> router eigrp 20 >>> distribute-list route-map SETTAG out FastEthernet0/0 >>> >>> I know the route-maps are being used on each router because I can >>> see the access list counters are incrementing. I am using C2691 >>> routers in GNS to emulate a client setup. I look forward to your >>> responses. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- >>> Vikas Sharma >>> Network Specialist >>> Fujitsu Australia >>> (M): 0421 052 117 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> > -- Vikas Sharma Network Specialist Fujitsu Australia (M): 0421 052 117 _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
