Thanks Matt,
Once i've done reading MPLS and Metro and DSL book, i'll book my written then
see how it goes.
Cheers!
Antonio
CCIE #25609
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:33:26 +1100
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Another dynamips problem...
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
>
> I have sat the SP written, and the stuff I mentioned earlier is enough
> to pass IMO.
>
> If you have just passed R&S and it is all good to go I would be
> booking the SP written in the next week or so. Plus if you take the
> written tomorrow and fail you can go back and study the things you
> missed out on which might save you some time ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
>
> CCIE #22386
> CCSI #31207
>
> 2009/11/13 Antonio Dee <[email protected]>:
> > Matt,
> >
> > You have done your SP Written already right? and you are prepping up for the
> > lab already?
> >
> > I didn't waste time on my side, zooming around MPLS Fundamentals now and
> > Metro Ethernet while RS is still very fresh on my head :-)
> >
> > do you think i have to go through and review some RS materials that are part
> > of the SP blueprint? L2 stuff, OSPF, EIGRP, it's so tiring already :-( or
> > just after completing MPLS stuff, Metro and DSL, just take the written so I
> > can proceed asap for lab preparation.
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Antonio
> > CCIE #25609
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:54:30 +1100
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> CC: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Another dynamips problem...
> >>
> >> I am not familiar with the current generation of R&S Labs, as my
> >> IPExpert R&S book is not a recent one (8.x I believe, but Im probably
> >> wrong, and the book itself is sitting in a box in my parents house
> >> about 800km away so I cant check). However I do know the topologies
> >> are identical. I do not know if they use the same IOS or not (I guess
> >> they do).
> >>
> >> As for initial configs, I delete everything that is not specifically
> >> relevant or required for the lab I'm doing. This includes scheduler
> >> commands, unused interfaces, anything that is on the vty etc. The
> >> only stuff that goes in would be IP addresses, frame maps, whatever
> >> basic routing there is etc. I find this improves reliability greatly.
> >>
> >> As for "general" overlap between R&S and SP - it is reasonable. I
> >> think that the SP written can be passed with R&S written materials,
> >> the MPLS fundamentals book and some basic optical knowledge such as
> >> signaling methods for SDH. I am also of the feeling there is greater
> >> overlap today with R&S and SP as there was when I did R&S due to the
> >> inclusion of MPLS in R&S. However this is really unqualified because
> >> I have not seen a 4.0 lab, or any 4.0 training material for that
> >> matter. What you will also find is after you pass R&S you really wont
> >> be arsed doing any study whatsoever for a significant period. It took
> >> me >8 months to begin study for SP when before I sat my R&S lab I
> >> thought I would start immediately after. I wish I did because I
> >> probably would be ready to sit the SP lab now.
> >>
> >> Very vague I know, but hope it helps :)
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Matt
> >>
> >> CCIE #22386
> >> CCSI #31207
> >>
_________________________________________________________________
Want to know what your boss is paid? Check out The Great Australian Pay Check
now
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639755/direct/01/_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
